91 Ocatane ? - AcuraZine Community
AcuraZine Acura Forums HomeAcura CL ForumsAcura MDX ForumsAcura NSX ForumsAcura RDX ForumsAcura RL ForumsAcura RSX ForumsAcura TL ForumsAcura TSX ForumsAcuraZine Regional DiscussionAcuraZine ZDX DiscussionAcuraZine Off Topic Discussion

Go Back   AcuraZine Community > AcuraZine TL Community > Third Generation TL (2004-2008)

Welcome to Acurazine.com!
Welcome to Acurazine.com.

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, join Acurazine.com community today!


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-09-2004, 11:51 AM   #1
berlinrl
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: pittsburgh, pa
Posts: 280
91 Ocatane ?

What gas companies have 91 Octane ? I usually see Plus that is
89 or Premium that is 94.
This ad is not displayed to registered or logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on Acurazine!
berlinrl is offline   Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered users do not see this ad.
Click here to register for free!
Old 05-09-2004, 11:58 AM   #2
jdone
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Louisville
Posts: 1,431
Just use the 94 octane, or, if you are a bit anal, use half 89 and half 94.
jdone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 12:18 PM   #3
unlemming
Smitty's Moral Police
 
unlemming's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bossier City, LA
Age: 32
Posts: 857
Come out west and you'll never see more than 91 from any company..
unlemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 12:44 PM   #4
Ron A
Administrator
 
Ron A's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 18,760
The manual calls for 91 octane, so that is the minimum you should use.
Ron A is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 1:10 PM   #5
GaleForce
You touch my tra la la...
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 22
Posts: 2,778
I heard the West Coast only has 91 octane due to some stupid limits on octane levels. For example, Mobil sells 93 octane except on the west coast where the same name gas is only 91.
GaleForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 1:42 PM   #6
NsX Pilot
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Dec 2001
Age: 44
Posts: 1,679
Even here on the east coast Sunoko has stopped making 94 ultra and is now 93 ultra.
NsX Pilot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 1:52 PM   #7
iceneedle
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 54
I'm not a chemist, but I did hear an explanation once of what the point is with the octane rating. I believe the only issue is that the higher the octane, the higher the 'threshhold of combustion'. Raising this prevents the gas/air mixture from igniting before the spark fires due to the compression in the cylinder. If you use low octane gas on a car with high compression (like the TL), you'll tend to get 'pre-ignition', which means the gas explodes before the spark fires (i.e. before the piston gets to the top of the cylinder). This is a bad thing because it tries to push the piston back down, when it's still coming up. It results in a metallic pinging sound on hard acceleration.

Somehow (I don't know how), Acura modifies something about the way the engine runs (maybe the spark timing?) to compensate if you're not using the correct gas.

Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).

If the car needs it, you should use it, but you needn't use anything higher than what's required. If you use higher than what's required, you still achieve the desired result. So if you use 91, 92, 93, 94 or higher in the TL, it works fine. If you use 91 in a non-type S RSX, you're wasting money.

If there's someone out there who knows more about this, please correct me. I believe, however, that this is a materially correct answer.
iceneedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 2:21 PM   #8
Skeedatl
Lurker
 
Skeedatl's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by unlemming
Come out west and you'll never see more than 91 from any company..
Up until recently there were some Unocal stations (Madero Road in Mission Viejo comes to mind) that sold Unocal 100 at the pump (I used it for my GN). It was expensive, but you could get it.
Skeedatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 2:25 PM   #9
GaleForce
You touch my tra la la...
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 22
Posts: 2,778
Wow. How much did it cost?
GaleForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 2:27 PM   #10
Skeedatl
Lurker
 
Skeedatl's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceneedle
I'm not a chemist, but I did hear an explanation once of what the point is with the octane rating. I believe the only issue is that the higher the octane, the higher the 'threshhold of combustion'. Raising this prevents the gas/air mixture from igniting before the spark fires due to the compression in the cylinder. If you use low octane gas on a car with high compression (like the TL), you'll tend to get 'pre-ignition', which means the gas explodes before the spark fires (i.e. before the piston gets to the top of the cylinder). This is a bad thing because it tries to push the piston back down, when it's still coming up. It results in a metallic pinging sound on hard acceleration.

Somehow (I don't know how), Acura modifies something about the way the engine runs (maybe the spark timing?) to compensate if you're not using the correct gas.

Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).

If the car needs it, you should use it, but you needn't use anything higher than what's required. If you use higher than what's required, you still achieve the desired result. So if you use 91, 92, 93, 94 or higher in the TL, it works fine. If you use 91 in a non-type S RSX, you're wasting money.

If there's someone out there who knows more about this, please correct me. I believe, however, that this is a materially correct answer.
High octane controls preignition (pinging) and you're right. Other than controlling pre-ignition it doesn't do much. The motor has knock sensors that detect preignition and will retard timing to try and compensate but of course retarding timing reduces HP. It also depends on your climate. Like here in SoCal it's been really hot lately, 20-30F above normal in a lot of areas. If you're driving in a hot climate, it can contribute to detonation, as does high loads (fast starts of hill climbs).

IMO, if you liven in a moderately cool climate, don't live in hilly terrain which puts a long consitant load on the car, you should be able to get away with running 89 without detonation.

However, you also have to ask yourself this. Just how much are you saving. Here in SoCal, gas prices are typically .10-.15 per grade with say 87 at $2.15, 89 at $2.25 and 91 at $2.35. So if you fill up on with 14-15 gallons, you're only looking at $1.50 to $3.00 per tank difference to run 91. Then comes how much to you fill up. I commute 50 each way to work so I'm filling up way more frequently than most people and it still comes out to about $6/wk extra for 91.
Skeedatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 2:42 PM   #11
Skeedatl
Lurker
 
Skeedatl's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleForce
Wow. How much did it cost?
The last time I got it at the pump was when I went racing in Vegas. It was a little under $4/gal (I think $3.95) on I think Flamingo and I went out of my way...most places were were $4.15/gal, but that was when their gas price for regular unleaded was only about $1.65.

In SoCal I've seen it for as cheap as $2.75 if you buy it by the drum (when prem 91 was $2.17/gal) and that's not bad at all. But then they get nearly as much again for delivery if you don't pick it up yourself.

But from my understanding ConocoPhillips which bought the Unocal refineries and I think even their service stations is no longer making these "race" grades anymore.
Skeedatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 2:47 PM   #12
iceneedle
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 54
iceneedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 2:48 PM   #13
iceneedle
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 54
In case you didn't realize, airplanes run on 100 octane Low Lead. That Unocal stuff was probably aviation fuel.
iceneedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 3:15 PM   #14
GaleForce
You touch my tra la la...
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 22
Posts: 2,778
Or it just had the same octane.
GaleForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 9:34 PM   #15
VTEC=happiness
What's a TL?
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Porter Ranch, CA
Age: 29
Posts: 1,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
Up until recently there were some Unocal stations (Madero Road in Mission Viejo comes to mind) that sold Unocal 100 at the pump (I used it for my GN). It was expensive, but you could get it.
They actually pump 103 at a station about 3 miles from my house. A lot of my friends running turbos use the stuff. Not sure on cost exactly, but I believe it is about $4-5 per gallon.
__________________
2006 BMW M3- SMG, Navi, Competition Package, Premium Package



SOLD: 3rd Gen/WDP/AT/Non-Navi
Injen Intake, Decklid Spoiler, Comptech Springs, Gunmetal Emblems, 19" Volk LE37t Wheels, Smoked Headlights
VTEC=happiness is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2004, 9:39 PM   #16
gregory28
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 438
Amoco, Mobil and Exxon all sell 93 octane in the Northeast.
gregory28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 7:05 AM   #17
catsailr
Registered User
 
catsailr's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Union City, TN
Age: 64
Posts: 392
Stations around here have 87, 89 or 93 octane. I remember years ago that Sunoco had a switch on the pumps that would blend the grades, depending on what octane you wanted. Seemed like a good idea since only 2 grades would be required and the desired octane could be anywhere between the low and the high.
catsailr is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 7:55 AM   #18
fishacura
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Phoenixville, PA
Age: 40
Posts: 306
Isn't 89 fine....in the grand scheme of things???
fishacura is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 8:06 AM   #19
Pug
Team Camel, VP for Zaino
 
Pug's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Madison, NJ
Posts: 476
Why does higher octane cost more? Does it take more time to refine it?
Pug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 8:33 AM   #20
iceneedle
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by fishacura
Isn't 89 fine....in the grand scheme of things???
Not for the TL. Its compression ratio is too high. You'll get pinging as explained above, which can potentially damage the engine. Honda compensates for this by changing the timing, but it's an imperfect solution, designed to be used if, for some reason, you can't get a tank of 91 octane gas.
iceneedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 8:36 AM   #21
iceneedle
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: West Orange, NJ
Posts: 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pug
Why does higher octane cost more? Does it take more time to refine it?
In the 'old days', lead was used to raise the octane of gas (which is why gas was leaded). Once they required unleaded gas (in the 70's??), I assume that it requires removing some more stuff from the crude oil, resulting in less gas per barrel of crude, hence a higher price. This is just a guess, but perhaps they add something to raise the octane like they used to add lead.

Anybody know something about this?
iceneedle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 9:01 AM   #22
jefffree
Team WD Member
 
jefffree's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: University Place, WA
Age: 54
Posts: 123
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleForce
I heard the West Coast only has 91 octane due to some stupid limits on octane levels. For example, Mobil sells 93 octane except on the west coast where the same name gas is only 91.
Union 76 has 92 Octane (at least here in the Tacoma, WA area).

FWIW, if you're in the neighborhood cheapest Premuim at $1.22/gal at 76
station at DuPont exit off I-5. Price goes up if you're not in the neighborhood.
__________________
2004 TL 5AT Navi, White Diamond Pearl/Quartz
Team WD Ambassador to Freedonia
XM Channels: 07, 46, 70, 71, 72, 73, 110
1960 Nash Metropolitan K7JF
jefffree is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 10:17 AM   #23
Skeedatl
Lurker
 
Skeedatl's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceneedle
In case you didn't realize, airplanes run on 100 octane Low Lead. That Unocal stuff was probably aviation fuel.
Unocal 100 is not aviation fuel. Unocal 100 is/was unleaded fuel, not low lead.
Skeedatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 10:23 AM   #24
dcarlinf1
Registered Member
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Louisville
Age: 45
Posts: 807
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceneedle
Summary: If the car doesn't need high octane gas, it doesn't buy you anything (i.e. you're wasting your money).
Not entirely true. The better the quality of the gas (higher octane rating) you use will directly effect your gas mileage. It makes the engine more efficient. So, it's true that it costs more, but you get some of that back in the extra miles traveled. Something to consider. Personally, I use premium in any car that has a high compression ratio as the TL does and 89 octane in everything else. Never use 87 octane. You save some $$ but you lose gas mileage and increase engine wear over time.
__________________
04TL, Anthracite/Ebony, 5AT/Non-Navi, Body kit, 18" OEM wheels, Injen CAI, Comptech rear sway bar
dcarlinf1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 10:43 AM   #25
Legion
Team Anthracite
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Fort Worth, TX
Age: 40
Posts: 10
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceneedle
Not for the TL. Its compression ratio is too high. You'll get pinging as explained above, which can potentially damage the engine. Honda compensates for this by changing the timing, but it's an imperfect solution, designed to be used if, for some reason, you can't get a tank of 91 octane gas.
Go check what the dealers put in. They use 87 from their own farm tank. You would only need 91 or better to see max performance from engine.
Legion is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 12:44 PM   #26
mattwood
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Roswell, GA
Posts: 11
Cleaner

Burning higher octane fuel has all the benefits mentioned in prev. threads... However, in burning lower octane fuels - when it detonates prematurley, it leaves very high carbon deposits on the cylinder wall and piston heads.

Not Good....
mattwood is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 12:57 PM   #27
rets
Mega Moderator
 
rets's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: NYC/SF/Tokyo/HK
Posts: 11,689
Question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron A
The manual calls for 91 octane, so that is the minimum you should use.

I don't think the different octanes will mix together, so for that reason the averaging method probably doesn't work with gasoline. Correct me if I am wrong. I think this has been mentioned here before, but I can't find it and a new discussion won't hurt.

Quick Q. I thought the same thing, but ever heard that Sunoco uses two tanks (high and low) and mix together to have all their octane oils...

Anyone knows this?

Thanks.
rets is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 12:59 PM   #28
GaleForce
You touch my tra la la...
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New York
Age: 22
Posts: 2,778
Finally filled my car up today driving home from lunch after my AP Biology exam :p

I had to buy 93 octane at Mobil and it was about 2.40 a gallon
GaleForce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 1:16 PM   #29
HuKaShI
Registered Member
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Clifton, NJ
Age: 31
Posts: 489
The differences in the octane of the west coast vs the east coast are because of altitude differences. The west coast is closer to sea level and therefore the air pressure is higher. The air here in the east coast is generally thinner and combusts much more easily therefore requiring a higher octane rating. Remember octane retards combustion.

I'm not completely sure my explanation is correct but I know its because of altitude.

Exceptions are due to the actual elevation you are at. You can be in the mountainous regions of california and have higher octanes there.
HuKaShI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 2:57 PM   #30
Skeedatl
Lurker
 
Skeedatl's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by HuKaShI
The differences in the octane of the west coast vs the east coast are because of altitude differences. The west coast is closer to sea level and therefore the air pressure is higher. The air here in the east coast is generally thinner and combusts much more easily therefore requiring a higher octane rating. Remember octane retards combustion.

I'm not completely sure my explanation is correct but I know its because of altitude.

Exceptions are due to the actual elevation you are at. You can be in the mountainous regions of california and have higher octanes there.
It doesn't have anything to do with altitude. The problem was 2 fold. High demands for premium fuels in California and CARB increasing emissions standards for Cali fuel blends (wanted to get away from the environmentally harmful Methyl-tertiary-butyl-ether. As emissions requirements for fuel blends increases, they wanted to use ethanol, but during testing the CEC (California Energy Commission) found that it was easier to make premium gas with ethanol, switching away from MTBE which was found to pollute ground water, if they dropped the octane level requirement for "premium" 1 point. As such, they sent out a survey to all the Cali refineries to see if they would make the new ethanol blend at the new octane rating. Most of course responded yes, thus the switch was made and we're stuck with the new ethanol 91 octane blend.
Skeedatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 7:38 PM   #31
jdone
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Louisville
Posts: 1,431
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ron A
The manual calls for 91 octane, so that is the minimum you should use.

I don't think the different octanes will mix together, so for that reason the averaging method probably doesn't work with gasoline. Correct me if I am wrong. I think this has been mentioned here before, but I can't find it and a new discussion won't hurt.
Trust an old chemical engineer, mixing different octane gas works just fine.
jdone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 8:56 PM   #32
kosh2258
Team Anthracite Member
 
kosh2258's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Southern MN
Posts: 563
Quote:
As such, they sent out a survey to all the Cali refineries to see if they would make the new ethanol blend at the new octane rating. Most of course responded yes, thus the switch was made and we're stuck with the new ethanol 91 octane blend.
Very strange since here in the midwest we have 92 octane premium that's 10% ethanol blend. We've had ethanol in nearly every grade of gas for close to 20 years.

Maybe the base stock is part of it, since I do know that compared to other parts of the country you'll seldom find a car exhaust that has the rotten egg smell in the upper midwest. But other areas... pew
__________________
Ted

04 TL 6MT Anthracite/Quartz Navi

Truth is a three edged sword...
kosh2258 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-10-2004, 9:50 PM   #33
takuyaah
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: san jose,San Diego,CA
Age: 27
Posts: 61
i was driving to las vegas yesterday from san diego...saw 100 octane from a 76...didn't get it =)
takuyaah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 12:48 AM   #34
NOX 3.2
TL-S - Rocks
2010 Acura TL
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 864
Quote:
Originally Posted by iceneedle
In case you didn't realize, airplanes run on 100 octane Low Lead. That Unocal stuff was probably aviation fuel.

AV-Gas
__________________
2010 TL SH-AWD Black/Ebony / 6MT / Tech NAVI
NOX 3.2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 9:56 AM   #35
Skeedatl
Lurker
 
Skeedatl's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 1,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by kosh2258
Very strange since here in the midwest we have 92 octane premium that's 10% ethanol blend. We've had ethanol in nearly every grade of gas for close to 20 years.

Maybe the base stock is part of it, since I do know that compared to other parts of the country you'll seldom find a car exhaust that has the rotten egg smell in the upper midwest. But other areas... pew
We also have oxygenated blends, if not oxygenated all the time. Perhaps other "clean air" B.S. additives contribute to this issue. It's also an issue of capacity as I read. The article I had read a while back specifically mentioned that the midwest has MUCH lower demands for premium fuels and a MUCH higher demand for 87, I'm assuming because of the "distribution" of types of vehicles people are buying, and the ease of getting ethanol. Being hydrophillic ethanol is difficult to transport, so cost of getting it to SoCal may also be an issue. The problem was meeting demand and it was easier to meet the demand with ethanol if they dropped the octane a point.
Skeedatl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-11-2004, 11:33 AM   #36
BigBluu
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 250
Quote:
Originally Posted by GaleForce
I heard the West Coast only has 91 octane due to some stupid limits on octane levels. For example, Mobil sells 93 octane except on the west coast where the same name gas is only 91.

Yep, west coast (CA at least) has only 91 as premium. Nothing higher than that. It used to be 92 a few years back. I've been driving for 15 years here and don't recall ever seeing 93/94.
__________________
2004 TL - Abyss Blue/Quartz/AT/Navi
2006 Ody - Ocean Mist/Ebony/Touring/Nav
BigBluu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 5:57 PM   #37
Casper42
04 TL 6MT NAVI ABP/Q
 
Casper42's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Simi Valley, CA 805
Age: 33
Posts: 1,310
Quote:
Originally Posted by jdone
Trust an old chemical engineer, mixing different octane gas works just fine.
Yup. A Friend of mine drives a Gas Tanker Delivery truck and says alot of the newer stations only (here in CA) get 87 and 91 delivered and will mix their own 89. Those that dont have the right equipment to do so pay to have 89 hauled in but he said even then, the 89 is just 87 and 91 mixed at the refinery.

Now that I know the TL reccomends 91, I'm gonna have to remind him to call me everytime he "drops a load" in Simi Valley where I live.
I wonder how much a 50 gallon drum and a hand pump costs....
Casper42 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 7:27 PM   #38
tlguy99
Team Anthracite Member
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The OC, CA
Age: 29
Posts: 779
Quote:
Originally Posted by dcarlinf1
Not entirely true. The better the quality of the gas (higher octane rating) you use will directly effect your gas mileage. It makes the engine more efficient. So, it's true that it costs more, but you get some of that back in the extra miles traveled. Something to consider. Personally, I use premium in any car that has a high compression ratio as the TL does and 89 octane in everything else. Never use 87 octane. You save some $$ but you lose gas mileage and increase engine wear over time.
The "quality" of the gas does not have much to do with the octane rating. The octane rating just signifies the number of octane molecules per some unit of measure (I can't recall what that unit of measure is at the moment). From the stand point of selling gas it really doesn't make sense to have different refining levels either. Most gas sold is 87 grade. People will form opions on different gas companies based on what grade gas they use. Following this logic it would make sense to refine 87 octane gas the best possible way to earn the reputation of having good gasoline. If a gas company refined higher grade gasoline through a better process, they wouldn't benifit from it all that much and they would get a reputation from allot of the population for having poorly refined gasoline.
tlguy99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 7:48 PM   #39
varanelli
Registered User
 
varanelli's Avatar
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Loudoun County, VA
Age: 40
Posts: 643
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skeedatl
Up until recently there were some Unocal stations (Madero Road in Mission Viejo comes to mind) that sold Unocal 100 at the pump (I used it for my GN). It was expensive, but you could get it.

I recently saw 100 octane gas at a Mobil station in Connecticut. It was $5.00+ per gallon. It was called CAM2 or something and was labeled "racing fuel." I'm pretty sure that putting this in the TL would not improve performance at all and could actually, over a long period of time, damage the engine that is not made to "handle" such high octane fuel.

I was tempted to put some in to see what happened, but then I started thinking rationally.

Don't waste your money.
__________________
04 TL 5AT
SSM/Ebony

E-Shift Pro Cats
AEM Cold Air Intake
UR Underdrive Crank Pulley
Outlaw Engineering ThermoBlok Spacers
Comptech Rear Sway Bar
Underbody Spoiler Kit
Wheels: 18x8 Sport Edition E1
Tires: Pirelli PZeroNero M+S

Pending:
Comptech Cat-Back Exhaust
Rotora BBK

Also: 2006 Toyota Sienna XLE AWD

Previously:
2004 Toyota Highlander V6 4WD
1996 Honda Civic EX Coupe
1985 Toyota Camry
1982 Toyota Celica GT
varanelli is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-25-2004, 9:11 PM   #40
jamesliu
Registered User
 
Trader Rating: (0)
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Age: 27
Posts: 33
91 Octane is dependant of what elevation of the city is at. Out here in SLC, UT, we don't have anything higher than 91. You will probably find the same situation in cities like Denver also. I don't recall what is the specific reason for this, but I think the higher octane is not as efficient burning in the high elevation because of the lack of oxygen. Also quarter mile times are lower up here because of the lack of oxygen compared at sea level.
jamesliu is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Honda and the Honda marquee are registered trademarks of the American Honda Motor Company, Inc. Neither American Honda Motor Company nor its subsidiaries or affiliates shall bear any responsibility for Acurazine.com content, comments, or advertising. Acurazine.com is not affiliated with American Honda Motor Company in any way. American Honda Motor Company does not sponsor, support, or endorse Acurazine.com in any way. Copyright/trademark/sales mark infringements are not intended or implied.