Why you should get 255/40-17 tires for your OEM rims !!!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2008, 09:29 PM
  #401  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes on 4,341 Posts
^^

The difference is these guys stayed with the stock wheel (17 x 8) and went from a 235 width to a 255 width.

Plus sizing is moving from stock 17" wheel to a larger wheel, say, 18", while maintaining the stock diameter. Plus sizing is more about getting a bigger wheel (18" or 19" for the TL). Plus 1 is going to 18", Plus 2 is going to 19".

To maintain the stock diameter with a bigger wheel, you have to go to a smaller section height. So 235/45/17 in a Plus 1 size might be 245/40/18.
Old 02-21-2008, 12:39 PM
  #402  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Has anyone had any problems getting the 255/40/17 installed on the 8 inch rim?
Old 02-21-2008, 01:05 PM
  #403  
Burning Brakes
 
S PAW 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^
Do you mean finding shops that will install them? I know it's a long thread, but quite a few have. Most shops won't accept the liability. Some don't mind.
Old 02-21-2008, 07:34 PM
  #404  
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
 
NBP04TL4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,953
Received 1,236 Likes on 1,023 Posts
Thumbs up

No problems whatsoever

I bought the tires from the Tire Rack and had them shipped to a local shop. They installed them, no questions asked. The sales rep I spoke with at the Tire Rack said that he didn't have anything that said that this size would fit, but if I knew the would fit (thanks AZ), he would sell them and ship them.

Good Luck!!
Old 02-21-2008, 11:33 PM
  #405  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Will let you know how it works out..tires should be in next week.
Old 02-22-2008, 03:42 PM
  #406  
Stay Out Of the Left Lane
 
NBP04TL4ME's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SE Mass --- > Central VA --- > SE Mass
Age: 57
Posts: 8,953
Received 1,236 Likes on 1,023 Posts
What tires did you buy?
Old 02-22-2008, 08:08 PM
  #407  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
255/40/17 Yokohama AVS ES100.
Old 02-23-2008, 10:32 PM
  #408  
Burning Brakes
 
Ramrodthrusterpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canaduh!
Age: 56
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Anyone with pix of the 255/40/17 on a TL-S?
Old 02-25-2008, 07:34 AM
  #409  
Burning Brakes
 
S PAW 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
I don't know if the author has a TL or TL-S, as it's debadged. Check out the first page of the thread. Look would be the same.

Busted again [lol!]
Old 02-25-2008, 03:00 PM
  #410  
Intermediate
 
frenchbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 71
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Would 255/45-17 tires fit without rubbing?
Old 02-25-2008, 03:04 PM
  #411  
Burning Brakes
 
Ramrodthrusterpuppy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Ottawa, Canaduh!
Age: 56
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by S PAW 1
I don't know if the author has a TL or TL-S, as it's debadged. Check out the first page of the thread. Look would be the same.

Busted again [lol!]

Yeah...ya got me!
His ride is a base TL, just wanted to see what the wider shoes looked like on the TL-S wheels.
Old 02-25-2008, 03:06 PM
  #412  
Racer
 
nhousepro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NAS Pensacola, Fl
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post pics!!!

All this talk about I got this tire and that tire...but no one is posting pics!!!! Post pics!!!
Old 02-25-2008, 03:13 PM
  #413  
Burning Brakes
 
S PAW 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by frenchbiker
Would 255/45-17 tires fit without rubbing?
See post #1 for answer.





Post pics!!!

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

All this talk about I got this tire and that tire...but no one is posting pics!!!! Post pics!!!

I counted over 20 pics on the first page!
Old 02-25-2008, 03:18 PM
  #414  
Burning Brakes
 
S PAW 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Ramrodthrusterpuppy

Yeah...ya got me!
His ride is a base TL, just wanted to see what the wider shoes looked like on the TL-S wheels.
They've got to look great.
For me though, it'll be 245/40/17's when ready for new shoes.
I'm not much of a risk taker. The 255's aren't much wider. That's just me, though.
Old 02-25-2008, 03:48 PM
  #415  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by frenchbiker
Would 255/45-17 tires fit without rubbing?

Generally yes.

That being said you really need to get the exact measurements of the tires you are buying before you buy them since most will vary in size.

For example the guy who started the thread got 255/40/17 Goodyear Eagle F1 (D3). I got 255/40/17 Yokohama's

The Goodyear puts down a tread width of 8.7" while the Yokohama has a tread width of 9.8" or over an inch bigger.

So you can see why even though the tires are nominally the exact same size they are not. So once again before you put down your money measure your current clearances, get the exact measurement of your current tires & the exact measurements of the tires you like.
Old 02-25-2008, 03:55 PM
  #416  
Racer
 
nhousepro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: NAS Pensacola, Fl
Age: 50
Posts: 359
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will a 255/35-18 tire work on an a 18x8 wheel? Or is it better to go with a 235/40-18?
Old 02-25-2008, 04:57 PM
  #417  
Intermediate
 
frenchbiker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Age: 71
Posts: 47
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BEAR-AvHistory
Generally yes.

That being said you really need to get the exact measurements of the tires you are buying before you buy them since most will vary in size.

For example the guy who started the thread got 255/40/17 Goodyear Eagle F1 (D3). I got 255/40/17 Yokohama's

The Goodyear puts down a tread width of 8.7" while the Yokohama has a tread width of 9.8" or over an inch bigger.

So you can see why even though the tires are nominally the exact same size they are not. So once again before you put down your money measure your current clearances, get the exact measurement of your current tires & the exact measurements of the tires you like.
Wouldn't a 255/45-17 look beefier? The 17" rim is kinda small, so if you put a 40 tire, it will leave a big gap between the tire and the fender. Just my opinion.
Old 02-25-2008, 05:20 PM
  #418  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by frenchbiker
Wouldn't a 255/45-17 look beefier? The 17" rim is kinda small, so if you put a 40 tire, it will leave a big gap between the tire and the fender. Just my opinion.
There is less then 1/2 inch height difference between the 255/40 & the 235/45 factory summer tire or base tire on the TL.

That suggests that the fender clearance will change by less then a 1/4 inch, but the tire cross section will increase from 9.2" to 10.4" & tread width will increase from 8.3" to 9.8"

Also the next bigger tire in the AVS ES 100 line is a 275/40/17 which is way to big (wide) for the stock rim to operate safely.
Old 02-25-2008, 10:11 PM
  #419  
Safety Car
Thread Starter
 
Inaccurate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Houston, Texas
Age: 64
Posts: 4,442
Received 481 Likes on 290 Posts
I am "the guy who started the thread".

A few quick comments.

1) I would say that the 255/45 will fit (speculation on my part). The 255/40 has mega clearance on my oem (100% stock suspension) 2006 TL (Not a TL-S). Just ask the store what their return policy is just in case.

2) The 255/40 will increase the gap in the wheel well slightly. So, if you are sensitive to having too much gap, then I would advice not getting the 255/40.

3) I agree that different tire brands/types differ in the exact physical size. I just purchased a 245/40 (yes, I said 245/40, not 255/40) as a spare tire to keep on-hand in case I need to quick replacement. I am going with the 245/40 instead of my beloved 255/40 because I get a lower gear ratio, better braking leverage, lighter weight, and stiffer sidewall. To my amazement, the Goodyear F1-D3 245/40 has the same thread width as the Goodyear F1-D3 255/40, just a shorter sidewall.
Old 02-26-2008, 01:30 AM
  #420  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Inaccurate
I am "the guy who started the thread".

To my amazement, the Goodyear F1-D3 245/40 has the same thread width as the Goodyear F1-D3 255/40, just a shorter sidewall.

Hi Guy

This is an important point that shows how you can get different results with different tire brands & different series with in the same tire brand.

In the AVS ES-100 line the 245/40 & 45 have the exact same tread width of 9.4 inches. The height is 25.6" for the 45 & 24.7" for the 40.

So in the case of these tires a 245/45 will fill the wheel well a little better, give you more tread width on the ground and a slightly poorer gear ratio then a stock replacement.

The ES-100 235/45/17 (Acura stock size) tread width is 9.1 inches & has a height of 25.4" which makes the 245/40 slightly shorter then stock & the 245/45 slightly taller.

To make matters more interesting the Acura (OE) factory installed summer tire option Bridgestone Potenza RE030 235/45/17, which I have now. has only an 8.3 tread width & a height of 25.5 so an exact replacement with a ES-100 235/45/17 would put all most an inch more rubber on the ground with no change in tire height.

BTW I have been running the ES-100 in a 225/45 - 245/40 stagger on my BMW 330CI for the last 25K miles & the ES-100's are true summer tires with phenomenal grip when they are warm & don't want to be anywhere near snow, ice or freezing weather.

This works for me because I have 2 4X4's for the small amount of really crappy weather we get in Carolina. The thing here is, if you have cold bad weather where you live, you need to be very, very honest with yourself about summer tires if the TL is your only or most important source of transportation.

Up North, I was born & raised in Jersey, true summer tires can be very dangerous to your health as they have zero traction in snow & ice. They are also marginal in very cold wet weather.

For summer tires - buyer beware.
Old 02-26-2008, 02:41 PM
  #421  
Intermediate
 
ctoro99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Baltimore Area
Age: 64
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bear -AvHistory

Just to be clear on this, you're saying that a 255/40/17 Yokohoma ES-100 will put more than 1" of thread on the road than the Goodyear F1 the exact same size? Does the tire itself look that much bigger than the F1 on the car? As say, looking at it from the back?

I thought that the with measurement of 255 mm is the same 255mm regardless of brand. Am I way off on this?
Old 02-26-2008, 02:51 PM
  #422  
2K8 CBP TL-S 6MT
 
P.R.E.A.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dirty Jerzey(908)
Age: 50
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ctoro99
I thought that the with measurement of 255 mm is the same 255mm regardless of brand. Am I way off on this?
that is the measurement from side wall to side wall not the read width
Old 02-26-2008, 02:54 PM
  #423  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes on 4,341 Posts
The 255 (or 245 or 235, etc) is the SECTION width. That is the width of the tire at it's widest point. Different tires/brands won't be EXACTLY 255, but they'll be close.

TREAD width is different than SECTION width and (as shown) can vary widely between tires/brands. This seems to be a function of design differences in the Tread Width, Shoulder and Sidewall.

Regarding this thread (putting 255's on 8" rims):

In general a wide tire (255) on a slightly narrow rim (8") needs more sidewall support (40 v 35). IOW - on an 8" rim 255/40 is "better" than 255/35.

Neither combination will be recommended by most tire manufacturers. They want you to have a minimum 8.5" rim for 255's.
Old 02-26-2008, 02:57 PM
  #424  
2K8 CBP TL-S 6MT
 
P.R.E.A.M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dirty Jerzey(908)
Age: 50
Posts: 281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
also here is another thing about "THREAD WIDTH" between different tire manufactures


Tread Width

The tread width is the distance between the outer edge and the inner edge of the tread of a new tire. However today's radial tires often feature tread designs that incorporate rounded shoulders and there is no industry standard pertaining to "how much" of the rounded shoulders should be included in the tread width measurement. Because of this, it is difficult to accurately compare the tread width differences of one tire brand to another. Tread width measurements are best used when comparing the various tire sizes or lines manufactured by a single tire manufacturer. Several tire manufacturers have chosen not to publish tread width dimensions.
Old 02-26-2008, 03:38 PM
  #425  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by ctoro99
Bear -AvHistory

Just to be clear on this, you're saying that a 255/40/17 Yokohoma ES-100 will put more than 1" of thread on the road than the Goodyear F1 the exact same size? Does the tire itself look that much bigger than the F1 on the car? As say, looking at it from the back?

I thought that the with measurement of 255 mm is the same 255mm regardless of brand. Am I way off on this?
Yes its about an inch wider in its contact patch.

I have ES-100 245/40's on the rear of my BMW 330 & 225/45 on the front. The tread width on the ground measured with a ruler is just under 9 inches for the 225 & just under 9 an a half inches for the 245.

The 225 on the front of the BMW at 8.7 is wider then the 235 stock summer tire at 8.3 on the TL & its easy to see the difference.

I hope to get the 255's on tomorrow & will post a few pictures.
Old 02-27-2008, 01:42 PM
  #426  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts

Optional factory 235/45/17 Summer tires.


ES100 255/40/17


ES100 255/40/17


12" ruler

No problem at all getting them installed. I got them from Tire rack but few of the local tire dealers sell this size for the TL.
Old 02-27-2008, 02:56 PM
  #427  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes on 4,341 Posts
Looking good!

Side Shot (for the sidewall/fender gap) ??

Are you dropped? Looks like some negative camber, but hard to tell how much.
Old 02-27-2008, 03:16 PM
  #428  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by Bearcat94
Looking good!

Side Shot (for the sidewall/fender gap) ??

Are you dropped? Looks like some negative camber, but hard to tell how much.
Ride height is stock as are all suspension settings.





Old 02-27-2008, 03:28 PM
  #429  
Oderint dum metuant.
 
chill_dog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lake Wylie
Age: 46
Posts: 12,496
Likes: 0
Received 534 Likes on 446 Posts
Since we're all requesting pics, can you take a 3/4 shot?
Old 02-27-2008, 03:43 PM
  #430  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by chill_dog
Since we're all requesting pics, can you take a 3/4 shot?
Maybe in the morning..would have to play musical cars to get enough room do it now.

Bottom line its a very subtle difference (except for the tread pattern) from stock which is what I was looking for.

That being said if its parked next to a TL with stock tires you can see they are much wider but just about the same overall height.
Old 02-27-2008, 04:20 PM
  #431  
Burning Brakes
 
S PAW 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Ok Bear...it looks good.
I have to ask you....why did you did decide to go with the 255's?
Old 02-27-2008, 06:29 PM
  #432  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by S PAW 1
Ok Bear...it looks good.
I have to ask you....why did you did decide to go with the 255's?
HeHeHe, yeah I did think the 255's were a bad plan when this thread first came out.

A few things entered into my choice but the main one was the lack of a significant difference in cross-section which would effect both sidewall flex & the stability of the contact patch.

When I priced the 245's I found out the 255's were exact the same price as the 245/45/17's that I expected to buy & in some cases the 255 came out as a recommended upgrade over the stock & 245 tire. This made me look into it a little more.

When I checked the numbers the actual cross-section was about 6/10ths of an inch wider for the 255 over the 245.

Also, the 255 did not seem to be grossly oversize because its is less then an inch wider in crosssection then the 235 stock replacemnet.

The final push was a number of the tire shops here in Raleigh like Discount Tires list the ES-100 255/40/17 as a replacement. Tire Rack had no problem with the size even though there was no finincial incentive to them to go with a bigger tire; only potential liability & Merchants Tire had no issues with installing them.

Had the section width been greater I would have definatly gone with the 245's.

This all comes back to my earlier post about none of these tires by different manufactures being the same in real life even though the are listed as being the same in the general spec 235/45/17, 245/45/17 or 255/40/17 etc.

There are any number of 255's with 10+ inch cross-sections that are definatly to big for the stock 8" rim so you have to check the tire of choice very carefully.
Old 02-27-2008, 10:40 PM
  #433  
08 TL Type S A-Spec
 
VegasRPh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Here are some pics of the STOCK 235/45/17 size Michelins and my new Falken FK 452s in 245/45/17 size. I DID look at the 255/40/17, but I was concerned about the speedo difference and making the fender gap larger with a thinner sidewall tire. SINCE MY CAR IS A LEASE, I don't intend to drop it. Here is mine:

Type S with the 245/45/17 size:







Stock Michelins:
Name:  08TLTypeS001.jpg
Views: 1501
Size:  75.6 KB
Old 02-28-2008, 07:20 PM
  #434  
Intermediate
 
ctoro99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Baltimore Area
Age: 64
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
BEAR-AvHistory and Inaccurate,

When I first read the post by Inaccurate I was immediately sold since I have always been a fan of the Goodyear F1 DS. I was familiar with the ride and noise qualities of the tire. (would like to keep a quality ride) Reading that post just solidified my opinion. But now I have BEAR telling us that the Yoko AVS (same size) put over an inch of rubber on the road - a very appealing thought for me. The question I have is, with all else being equal (size according to manufacturer specs that is), how do the Yoko compare to the Goodyear on ride comfort, noise quality and even thread wear?

Like I said, I know the F1 is a very good tire w/ high ratings on the Tirerack site, but having a wider looking tire carries a lot of weight for me on this upgrade.

Also, there is some talk about the use of a 255/45/17 to fill the wheel well but I could not find that size on their website. Do they (Goodyear/Yokohoma) make this size tire?
Old 02-28-2008, 09:18 PM
  #435  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
Originally Posted by ctoro99
The question I have is, with all else being equal (size according to manufacturer specs that is), how do the Yoko compare to the Goodyear on ride comfort, noise quality and even thread wear?

Also, there is some talk about the use of a 255/45/17 to fill the wheel well but I could not find that size on their website. Do they (Goodyear/Yokohoma) make this size tire?
I have no idea, never had those specific Goodyear's to compare with, although I have had Goodyear's on other cars & never had any problems with them.

I have the ES-100's on my BMW 330ci for about 25,000+ miles & they are doing fine with plenty of rubber left.

They are certainly much better in the wear department then the BMW (OE) Continental tires that came with the performance package. They have outlasted one & a half sets of the Continental's so far.

My prior experience with them on the 330 is one of the reasons I chose them for the TL. Never noticed any noise so I expect its OK, but I have not really been looking for any.

As far as I know Yokohama does not offer a 45 aspect ratio in a 255, but the 255/40 was close enough to the stock tire in height to do what I wanted. One of my goals was to add a good bit more traction over the Bridgestone Potenze RE030's that came with the car without noticeably changing the look of the car.

Also its a minor point, but I was going to a wider tire to improve acceleration off the line somewhat & a taller tire like a 45 will have a small effect in reducing your effective gear ratio which hurts acceleration in the lower gears.

People that know tires will spot them from behind very quickly but most people will not give them a second glance.

That being said tires are like oil, oil filters & high octane gas on this forum. You will get a thousand opinions most of them disagreeing with each other.
Old 02-28-2008, 10:13 PM
  #436  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes on 4,341 Posts
Originally Posted by ctoro99
BEAR-AvHistory and Inaccurate,

When I first read the post by Inaccurate I was immediately sold since I have always been a fan of the Goodyear F1 DS. I was familiar with the ride and noise qualities of the tire. (would like to keep a quality ride) Reading that post just solidified my opinion. But now I have BEAR telling us that the Yoko AVS (same size) put over an inch of rubber on the road - a very appealing thought for me. The question I have is, with all else being equal (size according to manufacturer specs that is), how do the Yoko compare to the Goodyear on ride comfort, noise quality and even thread wear?

Like I said, I know the F1 is a very good tire w/ high ratings on the Tirerack site, but having a wider looking tire carries a lot of weight for me on this upgrade.

Also, there is some talk about the use of a 255/45/17 to fill the wheel well but I could not find that size on their website. Do they (Goodyear/Yokohoma) make this size tire?



First, the "fill the wheel well" thing, if it exists at all, is mostly an illusion. You *should* be selecting a wheel/tire combo that is within ~3% of the stock diameter - most are around 1% - 1.5%. You may gain or lose ~1/4" of gap, but not much more.

Second, there was post (this thread or another) that basically said the Section Widths (255, 245, 235, etc) are well defined as the widest point of a given tire. These can be compared across manufactuers and brands.

However, the thread went on to point out that there is no standard to determine Tread Width. Some manufacturers include part or all of the shoulder and some don't. So BEAR's Yoko's and someone else's Goodyears (or BStones or whatever) might actually have very similar Tread Width IF they are measured the same way.

IOW - take the manufacturers numbers with a grain of salt and then go check for yourself.


Oops! Almost forgot. Only place I can think to get subjective comparision on the ride/noise qualities of the two tires in question is from the Tire Rack user survey's. For the Yoko and GY F1 I am not sure if they in the same performance category on Tire Rack or not. If not, I don't know if the ratings will be "apples-to-apples".
Old 02-29-2008, 12:47 AM
  #437  
08 TL Type S A-Spec
 
VegasRPh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Age: 49
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
As the tire gets WIDER on an 8" rim.............the tire will get TALLER.
P235/45/17 is STOCK size on our 17" X 8" rims..................SO, if you go to 245 or 255...... the tire will be WIDER, but it will also get TALLER..........the sidewall will "STAND UP".

I looked at a 255/40/17 on one of my wheels............it looked good, but I started to see that the "contact patch" wasn't sitting flush on the ground. Also, the sidewall was trying to STAND UP more...........since the tire was so wide.

I noticed this with my 245/45/17 size vs 235/45/17 stocks...........it's faint, but it's there.
Old 02-29-2008, 03:37 AM
  #438  
Suzuka Master
 
BEAR-AvHistory's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Raleigh, NC - USA
Age: 82
Posts: 7,674
Received 2,599 Likes on 1,581 Posts
The best way to check the actual contact patch width, which will vary by car weight & air pressure, is to have the tire mounted & loaded with the cars weight then driven over a ruler to take a measurement.

Eventually the tires will were some & you will be able to see the contact patch as the warn area. This can vary somewhat based on the tire construction & how much lateral movement you get in cornering but it should be good enough for government work.

The 255/40/17 ES-100 on the front wheels puts down just slightly less then 10" on a 06 - 6MT @ 35lbs with a full tank of gas when run over a ruler. I weigh 210 but don't know how much that effects the tires contact patch.

The rears carry less vehicle weight, about a 60/40 distribution on the FWD, but only have 32lbs air in them, as per the door jam specs, to compensate for the reduced weight but I have not checked their contact patch.
Old 02-29-2008, 05:39 AM
  #439  
Burning Brakes
 
S PAW 1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 1,158
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
[QUOTE=VegasRPh]As the tire gets WIDER on an 8" rim.............the tire will get TALLER.


I don't believe that is necessarily true.
As the tire widens, the sidewall shortens, thus the diameter.
Old 02-29-2008, 07:21 AM
  #440  
AZ Community Team
 
Bearcat94's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: N35°03'16.75", W 080°51'0.9"
Posts: 32,488
Received 7,770 Likes on 4,341 Posts
[QUOTE=S PAW 1]
Originally Posted by VegasRPh
As the tire gets WIDER on an 8" rim.............the tire will get TALLER.


I don't believe that is necessarily true.
As the tire widens, the sidewall shortens, thus the diameter.

I think Vegas means the same size tire on different rim widths will change the sidewall profile.


Quick Reply: Why you should get 255/40-17 tires for your OEM rims !!!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:04 AM.