'06 TL poor mpg

Old 04-03-2011, 08:34 PM
  #1  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
nyczkennyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
'06 TL poor mpg

i saw some threads on poor mpg about tls tsx and mdx. i figure i should be getting around the same mpg as the tls but i just want feedback from base auto tl owners to get the closest numbers.

so i got a 06 base a/t tl with almost 42k. for the past 3 months or so i have been getting really shitty city milage. i avg about 25/26 highway so im okay with that but im averaging about 13/14 mpg city. i know short trips and stop/go at redlights/stop signs hurt your mpg but 13/14 seems a little too low. i only use my car to go to school and back which is about 6 miles a day just local no highway at all. i tried driving with a light foot and braking early for 2 full tanks and i only get 200 plus/minus 10 miles a tank. i dont have a cai or aftermarket exhaust. i dont keep anything heavy in the car. only things extra is aspec front and rear lip. my stock tires with 10k miles left with psi kept at 35/36.

any reason why my city mpg is so shitty? any tips to improve it? gas at state college is 3.89 for premium and im thinking about not driving at all if if my mpg doesnt improve and gas continues to rise.
Old 04-05-2011, 11:48 AM
  #2  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
6 miles on a cold engine certainly isn't the optimum driving range for the best fuel mileage, and it shows. The EPA has 18 city, but that is a combination city/highway and derived from an engine up to temp. The next few fill-ups, log the mileage and gallons used and with the warmer weather the mileage will rise.
Old 04-05-2011, 05:19 PM
  #3  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
nyczkennyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
would it help to wait for the engine to warm up before driving? i read somewhere 10 seconds is enough wait time before driving. anymore time would just be wasting gas. i am getting a CAI soon how much mpg improvement should i see with that?
Old 04-05-2011, 06:29 PM
  #4  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
1-2. but wont be noticeable since you'll enjoy the sound of vtec more, thus burying your foot into the skinny pedal.
Old 04-05-2011, 08:24 PM
  #5  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by nyczkennyy
i am getting a CAI soon how much mpg improvement should i see with that?
None, just a lot of noise.
Old 04-08-2011, 02:33 PM
  #6  
Racer
 
donaldso718's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Age: 37
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by nyczkennyy
i saw some threads on poor mpg about tls tsx and mdx. i figure i should be getting around the same mpg as the tls but i just want feedback from base auto tl owners to get the closest numbers.

so i got a 06 base a/t tl with almost 42k. for the past 3 months or so i have been getting really shitty city milage. i avg about 25/26 highway so im okay with that but im averaging about 13/14 mpg city. i know short trips and stop/go at redlights/stop signs hurt your mpg but 13/14 seems a little too low. i only use my car to go to school and back which is about 6 miles a day just local no highway at all. i tried driving with a light foot and braking early for 2 full tanks and i only get 200 plus/minus 10 miles a tank. i dont have a cai or aftermarket exhaust. i dont keep anything heavy in the car. only things extra is aspec front and rear lip. my stock tires with 10k miles left with psi kept at 35/36.

any reason why my city mpg is so shitty? any tips to improve it? gas at state college is 3.89 for premium and im thinking about not driving at all if if my mpg doesnt improve and gas continues to rise.
Dude I am from NYC also, live in Brooklyn. I have a 2005 TL. I am averaging the same as you. 13-14 mpg strictly local (city). And about 26-29 on highway ONLY (but it's rare that I do mostly highway only on a tank).

Combined I get 17-19 mpg. I thought maybe there is something wrong with my engine/transmission/tires/driving style.. but I guess not.

I guess I just have to suck it up. I've been trying to drive less nowadays since gas prices has surpassed $4/gal.
Old 04-09-2011, 03:47 PM
  #7  
Cruisin'
 
scubasteve05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 41
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Have you checked your spark plugs and/or your air filter? I know that is not a lot of miles on your car, but one way or another, you are burning more gas than you should be. Do you ever feel like the car just doesn't have a lot of power if you ever punch the accelerator?

I have an '07 type s that I drive like I stole and I live in MN. I average about 23 mpg, with about 60 city/40 hwy split...this includes my fast acceleration and need for speed. I would suggest getting it checked out as my car should get a tiny bit worse gas mileage than yours.

Let me know what you find out on this as I am interested to know.
Old 04-09-2011, 05:01 PM
  #8  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by scubasteve05
Have you checked your spark plugs and/or your air filter?
Plugs and air filter won't change the fuel mileage as long as there isn't a dead missfire which there isn't in this thread.
Old 04-11-2011, 01:39 PM
  #9  
Advanced
 
Acuraman101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 56
Received 12 Likes on 6 Posts
I dissagree with this!

Originally Posted by Turbonut
Plugs and air filter won't change the fuel mileage as long as there isn't a dead missfire which there isn't in this thread.

There are very big numbers for fuel economy in just the right clean air filter,and if you have old crappy sparkplugs you may not have any misfire.But you will not be at the peak of clean power.Their in you will get BAD fuel economey.
Old 04-11-2011, 09:40 PM
  #10  
Cruisin'
 
scubasteve05's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Minneapolis
Age: 41
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks Acuraman101...That is what i was trying to get at. I know spark plugs don't make a huge difference, and the air intake won't do a tone, but getting new plugs in if the old ones are bad and changing out the air filter could easily boost mpg by 3-5 miles/gal.
Old 04-11-2011, 09:58 PM
  #11  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
^only performance is lost, not MPG with a dirty air filter.
Old 04-11-2011, 10:59 PM
  #12  
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
nyczkennyy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: NYC
Age: 34
Posts: 90
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
how do i check if my spark plugs are no good? i still feel power when i floor it to hear the vtec
Old 04-11-2011, 11:07 PM
  #13  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
The ECU controls the Air/Fuel ratio and it will always be constant, therefore a dirty air filter has no effect on fuel efficiency.
Old 12-26-2011, 08:57 AM
  #14  
Intermediate
 
stepuptata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Age: 49
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
just got a 07 tl s and MPG sucks baddly! I get only 200 on a tank compared too 300 plus on my 04 TL with the same set up as tl!

What the HELL!
Old 12-26-2011, 10:13 AM
  #15  
Mr. Detail
 
Scottwax's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Arlington, TX
Age: 62
Posts: 1,096
Received 198 Likes on 151 Posts
6 miles each way in the cold is what is killing your mileage. Engine probably isn't warmed up until at least halfway to your destination. Letting your car sit and idle until warm won't help either, it warms up faster when you actually drive it.

Making sure your plugs and air filter are good will help maximize your mileage, also check the air pressure in the tires. If it was warm last time it was done, they might be down several pounds now that it is cold.
Old 12-27-2011, 03:32 PM
  #16  
Pro
 
spaceboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 621
Received 64 Likes on 52 Posts
i think u will get better mpg with 60miles each way on highway than 6 miles each way in local.....
Old 12-27-2011, 03:41 PM
  #17  
Racer
 
Deerole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: NyC
Posts: 359
Received 35 Likes on 30 Posts
I thought I was the only one...I live in NYC i get about 13mpg local. its like the gas idle just keeps droppign n dropping n i dnt even drive the car hard like tht
Old 12-27-2011, 04:22 PM
  #18  
Intermediate
 
lilusadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Age: 36
Posts: 49
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by justnspace
^only performance is lost, not MPG with a dirty air filter.


I hope nobody is buying your krabbie patties.
Old 12-27-2011, 04:43 PM
  #19  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
^okay, sir.



Originally Posted by I hate cars
With the plugged air filter, airflow is reduced so fuel is also reduced by a proportionate amount. The net result is a loss of power but not mileage.

I see what you're saying about WOT but it doesn't just dump all the available fuel. Most older FI cars base WOT fueling on the long term fuel trims. So if the filter has been plugged for a while, even WOT fueling will be proportionate. Newer cars like the TL stay in closed loop at WOT.

On top of that, there will be more manifold vacuum at WOT with a plugged filter so the computer sees this as a decrease in airflow and adjusts accordingly.

Last edited by justnspace; 12-27-2011 at 04:46 PM. Reason: added a little proof. can get more if needed
Old 12-27-2011, 10:09 PM
  #20  
Advanced
 
sloppyjoe92's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Age: 31
Posts: 67
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
I get 20 mpg city when I drive slow in SS mode 13 mile drive in urban areas to work. I also speed doing 50 60 mph on all roads lol maybe you need to drive faster.
Old 12-28-2011, 01:38 AM
  #21  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
I lost 3-5 City MPG switching from OEM 17s to 19s
Old 12-28-2011, 01:41 PM
  #22  
Intermediate
 
lilusadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Age: 36
Posts: 49
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
With reduced performance comes reduced fuel mileage.
Less power, more work. Kinda like BMW M# vs Toyota Prius on Top Gear. BMW M# got better mileage than the Prius. Less power, more work. Yes, the car will adjust AF ratios to adapt to a dirty filter but that will reduce power which in turn reduces mileage.
Old 12-28-2011, 01:44 PM
  #23  
Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
justnspace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Posts: 86,295
Received 16,260 Likes on 11,971 Posts
^nope.
Old 12-28-2011, 02:12 PM
  #24  
Intermediate
 
lilusadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Age: 36
Posts: 49
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^ what ever you say boy o.. there is a point at which a dirty filter hurts mileage. Let me make myself a little clearer because I fear that I may be getting misunderstood. The dirty air filter is compensated for by the fuel injection system and has little effect on mileage. Yes, I agree with this. The issue is poor fuel mileage caused by the driver's right foot when faced with a reduction of performance caused by a dirty air filter. So, does a dirty air filter directly cause poor mileage?? . Does a dirty air filter indirectly cause poor mileage?? . All I can say is that a lab will prove over and over that the dirty filter does not effect mileage but it won't replicate real world driving. When my filter gets black and plugged and I replace it I always get a bump in mileage.
Old 12-28-2011, 04:07 PM
  #25  
Drifting
 
Jackass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: KCMO Burbs
Age: 47
Posts: 2,493
Received 591 Likes on 441 Posts
Originally Posted by lilusadude
The issue is poor fuel mileage caused by the driver's right foot when faced with a reduction of performance caused by a dirty air filter.
Yup.
Old 12-28-2011, 07:27 PM
  #26  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by lilusadude
^ what ever you say boy o.. there is a point at which a dirty filter hurts mileage. Let me make myself a little clearer because I fear that I may be getting misunderstood. The dirty air filter is compensated for by the fuel injection system and has little effect on mileage. Yes, I agree with this. The issue is poor fuel mileage caused by the driver's right foot when faced with a reduction of performance caused by a dirty air filter. So, does a dirty air filter directly cause poor mileage?? . Does a dirty air filter indirectly cause poor mileage?? . All I can say is that a lab will prove over and over that the dirty filter does not effect mileage but it won't replicate real world driving. When my filter gets black and plugged and I replace it I always get a bump in mileage.
From the EPA site:
"NEW INFORMATION: Replacing a Clogged Air Filter on Modern Cars Improves Performance but Not MPG
A new study shows that replacing a clogged air filter on cars with fuel-injected, computer-controlled gasoline engines does not improve fuel economy but it can improve acceleration time by around 6 to 11 percent. This kind of engine is prevalent on most gasoline cars manufactured from the early 1980s onward.
Tests suggest that replacing a clogged air filter on an older car with a carbureted engine may improve fuel economy 2 to 6 percent under normal replacement conditions or up to 14 percent if the filter is so clogged that it significantly affects drivability".

As we know, the A/F ratio is maintained by the ecu thru the feedback system, so no matter what you do with your right foot it won't dump uncontrolled fuel into the cylinders, no air no more fuel. You may try to get more fuel in by depressing the accelerator, but the electronics will still control the mixture, less air, less fuel, therefore poor acceleration but no difference in fuel mileage.
Old 12-28-2011, 09:16 PM
  #27  
Intermediate
 
stepuptata's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Age: 49
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbonut
From the EPA site:
"NEW INFORMATION: Replacing a Clogged Air Filter on Modern Cars Improves Performance but Not MPG
A new study shows that replacing a clogged air filter on cars with fuel-injected, computer-controlled gasoline engines does not improve fuel economy but it can improve acceleration time by around 6 to 11 percent. This kind of engine is prevalent on most gasoline cars manufactured from the early 1980s onward.
Tests suggest that replacing a clogged air filter on an older car with a carbureted engine may improve fuel economy 2 to 6 percent under normal replacement conditions or up to 14 percent if the filter is so clogged that it significantly affects drivability".

As we know, the A/F ratio is maintained by the ecu thru the feedback system, so no matter what you do with your right foot it won't dump uncontrolled fuel into the cylinders, no air no more fuel. You may try to get more fuel in by depressing the accelerator, but the electronics will still control the mixture, less air, less fuel, therefore poor acceleration but no difference in fuel mileage.

I agree..i think these 3.5L motor are just gas sucking turds!
I had a 03 Grand am 3.4 gt it got 23.5 mpg city all day long and had more Zip then the TL S I currently own! The S is getting 200 on a tank and my old 3.2 04 Tl got 300-320 easy in city!. Also, I think my 04 had more power!
Old 12-28-2011, 09:40 PM
  #28  
Chapter Leader (San Antonio)
iTrader: (3)
 
TheChamp531's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,022
Received 433 Likes on 319 Posts
People who disagreed about the filter not effecting MPG must feel stupid now...
Old 12-29-2011, 06:21 AM
  #29  
Suzuka Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Turbonut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: NJ
Age: 59
Posts: 7,901
Received 831 Likes on 679 Posts
Originally Posted by stepuptata
I agree..i think these 3.5L motor are just gas sucking turds!
I had a 03 Grand am 3.4 gt it got 23.5 mpg city all day long and had more Zip then the TL S I currently own! The S is getting 200 on a tank and my old 3.2 04 Tl got 300-320 easy in city!. Also, I think my 04 had more power!
Got to love these fuel mileage threads! I get sucked in all the time.

Well, here's the fuel mileage comparisons, assuming all A/T:
'07 TLS 17 city 26 hwy
'04 TL 18 city 26 hwy
'03 G.A. 18 city 27 hwy

Let's be realistic, if you saw 23.5 on the V-6 Grand Am all day long in city driving it must have been an early hybrid and if the 175hp powerhouse in the Pontiac gave you more acceleration than the TLS, then maybe the Acura is running on 4 cyl. The 8 sec 0-60 time is a far from the TL let alone a TLS. Guess you should have kept the Grand Am.
Old 12-29-2011, 09:06 AM
  #30  
Intermediate
 
lilusadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Age: 36
Posts: 49
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
People who disagreed about the filter not effecting MPG must feel stupid now...
Not one bit. I stand by what I said. You guys are all reading articles on the internet that comment on tests performed in lab studies. When a driver feels a lack of performance they will tend to drive the car harder which will cause the poor fuel mileage. So, going back to what I said earlier>>>Does a dirty filter DIRECTLY effect mileage?? No.. Does a dirty filter INDIRECTLY effect mileage?? YES because of the reduction in performance which ultimately results in the driver driving the car harder than normal.
Old 12-29-2011, 09:36 AM
  #31  
Intermediate
 
lilusadude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Baton Rouge, La
Age: 36
Posts: 49
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Turbonut
Got to love these fuel mileage threads! I get sucked in all the time.

Well, here's the fuel mileage comparisons, assuming all A/T:
'07 TLS 17 city 26 hwy
'04 TL 18 city 26 hwy
'03 G.A. 18 city 27 hwy

Let's be realistic, if you saw 23.5 on the V-6 Grand Am all day long in city driving it must have been an early hybrid and if the 175hp powerhouse in the Pontiac gave you more acceleration than the TLS, then maybe the Acura is running on 4 cyl. The 8 sec 0-60 time is a far from the TL let alone a TLS. Guess you should have kept the Grand Am.
Grand AMs are going to go down in history as one of the greatest engineering feats of our time! hahahaha
Old 12-29-2011, 02:20 PM
  #32  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
Originally Posted by TheChamp531
People who disagreed about the filter not effecting MPG must feel stupid now...
I used to preach that all the time, even posted the link from time to time but these threads just keep coming back over and over no many how many times you try and educate people.
Old 12-29-2011, 02:29 PM
  #33  
Team Owner
 
I hate cars's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Bakersfield
Posts: 20,172
Received 1,811 Likes on 1,282 Posts
To take it even further, I can tell people that mpg is directly based on average mph. Compare your mpg in the mpg vs mph thread and you'll see your TL is normal. No one gets this. Mine will knock down 32-34 on the freeway but when I do a month worth of pure city driving, the 1.5 miles each way to work and back it's normal to see 9mpg and 7mph. It's just the way it is when you spend so much time sitting at redlights and accelerating to 50mph only to have every closely spaced light turn red on you.

"City" does not describe the driving type. Some city driving could have an average mph of 45mph and 26mpg. Some city driving like mine has an average mph of 7 and mpg of 9. Only mph is useful in comparing car to car.

It takes a certain hp to accelerate a certain weight at a certain rate. With similar driving styles, there's not going to be a huge difference between similar cars, not until you're at freeway speeds where aerodynamics and friction come into play.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
emailnatec
5G TLX Tires, Wheels & Suspension
29
09-28-2018 04:27 PM
LogicWavelength
3G TL Photograph Gallery
33
11-01-2015 09:38 AM
brocksolid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
9
09-29-2015 12:28 PM
Froid
2G RDX (2013-2018)
3
09-27-2015 06:16 PM
ceb
ILX
2
09-27-2015 10:56 AM


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: '06 TL poor mpg



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:33 AM.